Messages posted by: Professor

Corner retirement.

lmao. dumbass

What about Ali vs Foreman.
Or recently Mosely vs Margarito

Or even in MMA, Couture vs Sylvia/Gonzaga, Lesnar vs Mir, BJ vs Sherk

GSP is superman, I love how everyone was trying to make it look likebthe doctor stopped it when his corner clearly asked him if he was ok, he shook his head no, when his corner clearly asked him if he wanted to stop he shook his head yes, his corner practically begged him to go another round, until his brother saw the quit in his eyes and called it off. GSP is Superman, but Alves may be Doomsday. Can't wait to see that.

Mikkel wrote:Had he fought Cotto and Margarito there whouldnt be a problem. But like RJJ, he only took the fights he was 99% sure to win.
It's just a damn shame..

Are you dense? RJJ held 6 titles at 175 continuously, including all 4 major titles. You can't win every fucking belt by hand picking your opponents if anything his division was just shitty, and he still beat Virgil Hill, P4P James Toney, Hopkins and the (at the time) undefeated Montell Griffin. This is what happens when people go on boxrec and look at records instead of actually following boxing. Way to look ignorant. Margarito is a bitch ass cheater no one needed to fight him. And Cotto was all hype.

Mayweather is legit don't be disrespectful.

Also, saying RJJ is a ducker is nothing beyond. He held and defended every major belt at 175. RJJ didn't duck, but if he ever tried, all the guy would have to do is become a mandatory for 1 out of about 4 different sanctioning bodies.
Crazy thread..

Dark Destroyer wrote:

Barrack Obama wrote:

Dark Destroyer wrote:

Barrack Obama wrote:No disrespect, but why should that count as Super Champ status? I think you guys should defend against others and see if you can hang on to those titles first. After you make several defenses and establish that you can keep those titles against most, next you should attempt to unify.

I just think it's sort of cheapens the accomplishment if you beat John for his two titles, but in reality 2 of them were handed to you without you having to fight anyone for them. In that case, it's like you won two titles to become Super Champ.

Good luck to the both of you.

No disrespect, but cheap?, what like retiring, making a new name and beating bums to win all 4?, I'm not here for an argument. I have paid my dues and beat alot of good fighters to get to rank 1, so it wasn't "two fights".

I remember unstop being in a similar situation yet it counted for him, in my eyes getting to rank one and being there for about a month is alot harder than wining 2 fights to become champ and anyway to become superchamp you have to win a minimum of 8 fights.

I didn't say you were cheap, just saying that route cheapens the Super Champ status. That, however, is just my opinion.

Ricky Hatton beat a lot of very good fighters, the best around actually. The top fighters had plenty of chances to take those titles.

I wasn't around when Unstoppable became Super Champ so I can't comment on that situation.

I could go into "Ricky Hatton's" record but I won't, it's not about that.

I'll give you an example of a real life event. If David Haye won a couple of titles because he was the mandatory challenger and the champion retires and Haye then get's given his titles, then beats another guy for the other two, he would be regarded as the undisputed champion of the world, no matter how he did it. Would people think he is on a level with HOFers like Ali, Frazier or Holyfield?, no, but he would be regarded as a "superchamp" none the less.

I do respect what you say though and understand completely where you are coming from and I definately know we would be the weakest superchamp out of all the guys that have achieved the feat in the past, but I also happen to think that I am the best active player on the game at the moment and have beaten alot of great fighters past and present to be given the chance to prove as champion what I have just said.

No.

Barrack Obama wrote:No disrespect, but why should that count as Super Champ status? I think you guys should defend against others and see if you can hang on to those titles first. After you make several defenses and establish that you can keep those titles against most, next you should attempt to unify.

I just think it's sort of cheapens the accomplishment if you beat John for his two titles, but in reality 2 of them were handed to you without you having to fight anyone for them. In that case, it's like you won two titles to become Super Champ.

Good luck to the both of you.

Dont bother, no one likes you.

lol shemales..

Kessler wrote:

Barrack Obama wrote:Fatny, hopefully you used some of these...

So you won't come back when some of these...

He would have to wear the condoms all over his pubes cuz that wouldn't stop the crabs LOL

Im guessing you arent very experienced.

Manny won't fight Mosley, he'd get knocked out. Only reason he fought Oscar was because Oscar was old and slow.

Speaking of Cotto, the next scheduled PPV is Cotto vs some random Brit named Michael Jennings. I don't underestand why 1: Cotto is fighting some unknown, 2: This is on PPV :Of all the Brittish fighters, why he chose this guy, I mean he could've fought Ricky Hatton's little bro to attract more people, or maybe this Kell Brook guy who is number 1 in England according to BoxRec.

Yeah, MMA is sucking now. The events are way too far apart and then sometimes they are shit. Like the last UFC event. They don't even have a universal set of rules for the 10 trillion companies out there.

Some people need hobbies.